Talking about the personal opinions of the two cars, please don’t spray me, gods, I was struggling with the need for a while ago, and I need to change the car.

First of all, I have experienced two m2cs, one with a direct brush and a direct pass, and one in the original state, and the tires are all original tires pss

Let's talk about the original m2c first, because there is no speed measuring device? Talk about the data and the driving experience. Compared with the m2 in my current state, the original m2c loses. First of all, the driving experience of the original shock absorber is really bad, the speed is too high, and the speed is too hard. Although the driving is smooth, it is easy to get dizzy. I am really a little dizzy.

Secondly, the power, the feeling of being suffocated all the time, I think it has something to do with the first paragraph, so this car is transparent, but do you think there is a difference with my m2? no! Of course I only drive below 120 speed. It almost feels? Too out.

Besides the sound, the sound of m2c is higher than that of m2. The sound of m2 can be described as charming, and m2c can only be described as a performance car. My friends who are not car gamers who have ridden in my car? I asked them for their evaluation of the sound of my car. Although this sound is not good, it is too similar to the sound of the street cars outside. Listen to it. , a simple description of the meaning is textured. The m2c sound is too diffuse, a little harsh and scary.

Let's talk about that straight brush? The straight-through m2c, the car known as 500p+

The state of my car on the day of the test was too bad, the 95 oil added and the normal mode used in the plug-in state, I feel the difference when I compare it. This s55 is really awesome, and the feeling of continuous output is very good. It is too similar to the m2 model. The n55 has to 5000-6000 rpm, and when the power bursts to the peak, the gaochao bursts out with a strong pleasure, and This s55 will give you a feeling of power from the beginning, and it will be broken (it may be a little too friendly for beginners), of course, my car does not have a direct brush, nor does it use a direct pass, and the car was in the state that day. ??. That led me to have a strong idea of changing cars at that time.

After that, I made some simple adjustments, firstly adding 98, secondly using additives, firstly running the plug-in in the highest gear, and thirdly changing the semi-hot melt; I can responsibly say that the driving experience of the car is very good, Very?, and completely dispel the idea of replacing m2c. I would like to say that the 5000-6000 rpm of the m2 is particularly cool. With the thick sound skin, the oil recovery and tempering, and the roar of shifting, as the most? I have only tested the 911turboS bottom hole frog, and I have not encountered it. It's been cooler. And? The poisonous one, I would like to open it every day.

A simple comparison of the two cars in my opinion:

1. Driving experience (non-track)

The daily m2 is better than the m2c, the head is lighter, and the counterweight ratio is better?

2. Feeling of motivation

The state of the original factory is different, but there is no doubt that the m2c has potential. The s55 engine performs better at 100-200, and the heat dissipation of the track is ahead of the n55 (but these are all for friends who require extremes)

3. Sonic exhaust

The sound of m2's n55? The best 6 cylinder I've ever heard! This price, this sound, absolutely worthy of the person who owns it, wonderful!

In the end, I gave some suggestions to buyers of m2c riders: 1. Must be brushed straight, 2. The shock absorber must be replaced, 3. The exhaust head section must be replaced (if you can tolerate the sagging tail drum? Use the rear section) , 4 also? Changed the original brakes, 5? Going to the track to get this engine

It has been two years since F20 to F87,

Originally, I wanted to share my experience of using the car and modifying it like in the past.

During this period, I also took some pictures on and off.

Really? It's not like the mood before.

Maybe? Because of the 7 years of experience with BMW, my heart is really tired.

But in a word, as far as ????????????????,???

The road to modification is endless.

But if the original performance car is changed, it will be a dead end. Because no matter how good the original factory is, it is limited by various regulations, road conditions, daily life and other factors that limit the performance of this car. But how to change, how to spend the money on the edge? Then? It needs the judgment of the car owner.

There is no perfect universal solution for modification in the world, just as there is no car brand that can suit everyone's taste or can be consumed by everyone!

If a new person asks, how to change it, how to change it more correctly, right? I don't have a perfect plan.

If someone asks, this is expensive and expensive, sorry, I ask you, do you know my feelings or not yours.

If you ask about this performance car, in general, I think the disadvantages definitely outweigh the advantages.

But we are also people who live on wages and buy a car in the range of 600,000 (indeed, it is also the money for a house in a domestic market and a first-tier city), but if you want me to choose again, I will still be firm in my choice. M2.

Always go your own way and let others tell you

Attached list of modifications:

Suspension: KW V3

The first paragraph: JBOM 100 mesh (as the owner of the first M2 JBOM in China, it is self-evident that he has too much praise for this brand)

Tail end: ASPCE

Wheels: HRES107

The most important purpose of posting is to share some pictures that I have taken, and hope that everyone will like it. Thanks!

Dividing line------------------------------------------------ ------------

About the debugging experience and experimental statistics of KW V3:

?, the reason for choosing to install v3.

1. There is no requirement for track performance, but it is expected to improve the shortcomings of the original factory without damping adjustment;

2. Mainly used for street running, suitable for main road conditions;

3. The original shock absorber is fast and stiff, and it is uncomfortable in daily life;

4. The budget is more moderate;

5. Quality assurance licensed;

6. Lower body

2. Comparison of using experience after installation:

1. The purpose of improving the shortcomings of the original factory is achieved;

2. No matter how you adjust the running street, it will be better than the original shock absorber;

3. With the factory damping setting, the daily driving feeling is a little jumpy, and the driving and riding experience will be comfortable, except that the pit is a little heavy;

4. The price is reasonable;

5. No quality problems have occurred

6. The body angle and front and rear damping are relatively adjusted

?, advantages and disadvantages

1. Advantages:

The adjustment degree is very wide, and the unique modes of rebound damping and compression damping are very playable. Buyers can freely set the damping according to their actual road conditions and requirements. Each debugging will bring about the same debugging experience. You can be as fast as you want to be responsive, and you want steering latitude?

2. Disadvantages:

There is no detailed damping debugging instructions, it is entirely based on exploration. If it is adjusted to respond quickly, the car will be stiff and jumpy, and if it is adjusted to be slow, the car will be sluggish, and it will be crisp enough.

Summary: The playability of v3?? The two-stage adjustment of rebound and compression is more precise to customer needs, but it also brings complex debugging and usage. Owners need to feel for themselves. How to debug the main thing? To the owner's own requirements.

?, debugging test statistics

1. 9 before rebound and 9 after 9, 6 before compression and 6 after compression:

Road feel: vague

Support: slow response

Change of direction: Moderate

Soft and hard: The speed is soft, the spring response is obviously slow, and the speed is moderate over the kerb. Although the fixed comfort problem has been solved, I feel that the car is comfortable enough.

2. Rebound front 9 and rear 9, compression front 4 and rear 4

Road feel: relatively clear

Support: there is a delay

Change of direction: cutting in quickly and returning to position is a bit slow

Soft and hard: moderate speed, more comfortable speed, slightly faster when changing direction and returning to position

3. Rebound front 3 and rear 5, compression front 9 and rear 9

The road feels blurry and the hand feels heavier. The line change feedback is faster, but the actual line change speed is slow? It is accurate enough and needs to be corrected. The car feels that the grip is increased and the speed is more stable, but it will sink when the speed is over the pit. Feels heavy.

4. Rebound before 7 and after 7, compress before and after 4:

Road feel: very clear

Support: relatively fast

Change of direction: sensitive and smooth

Soft and hard: fast over pits and shoulders, the spring has tension, but bounces more slowly over continuous flat sections or over shoulders.

Summary: It is suitable for galloping, the car is very smooth, and the people and cars are in harmony. However, when entering the city road or crossing the shoulder, the jumping is extremely fast, which is very comfortable, and the steering wheel is easily tense due to the fast jumping.

5. It is recommended to rebound before 7 and then 8, and compress before 4 and then 5.

The sense of direction is clear and fast, the acceleration is more direct, the crossing is fast, and the rebound strength is also wrong. It is most suitable for daily running on the street.

6. It is recommended to use 8 before rebound and 8 after 8, and 4 before compression and 4 after compression.

The road feeling is clear, and the quick bounce over the pit is slightly faster than the 74 rebound. The wiring is more precise, and the steering wheel is brisk. Suitable for daily running